{"id":1812,"date":"2016-12-02T11:11:50","date_gmt":"2016-12-02T18:11:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sebersole.wordpress.com\/?p=1812"},"modified":"2016-12-02T11:11:50","modified_gmt":"2016-12-02T18:11:50","slug":"free-speech-for-all-in-a-fact-free-era","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ebersolemedia.com\/blog\/free-speech-for-all-in-a-fact-free-era\/","title":{"rendered":"Free Speech for All in a Fact-Free Era?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Overheard in a newsroom<\/a>:\u00a0\u201cWhat is journalism even supposed to be now? We reported the facts, but they didn\u2019t matter.\u201d In case you didn’t hear, “post-truth” is Oxford Dictionary’s word of the year for 2016. Here’s how they define it on their website.\u00a0\"post-truth\"<\/p>\n

The challenge for journalists, and really\u00a0anyone who get to the bottom of things, is sorting out fact from fiction, reporting from commentary, and bias from perspective.<\/p>\n

The problem with the newsroom quote above is that too many “journalists” DIDN’T\u00a0report the facts. Or when they did, they didn’t put the facts in proper context. Added to that is that reality that nearly anyone can become a de facto journalist thanks to the wonders of modern digital media and social networks. Given a place to stand and a megaphone,\u00a0the most strident\u00a0voices have suddenly found themselves with the ability to sway opinions…even, perhaps, influence elections.<\/p>\n

If it seems that this blog is stuck on this topic (see recent posts about fake news<\/a> and fact-checking<\/a>), you’re right. But this is important…and if we don’t get this right we’ll have to live with the consequences. What consequences you say? Well, for starters how about a future where ideological conflicts spill over into the streets…where discourse and discussion give way to hate-filled rhetoric designed to alienate and subjugate the opposition?<\/p>\n

Unfortunately some of the\u00a0proposed solutions may turn out to be worse than the problem. Giving social media platforms a reason and permission to edit users’ posts is a dangerous and slippery slope. Do we really want Mark Zuckerberg’s algorithm and a team of editors deciding between fact and fiction, bias and perspective? We’ve already witnessed\u00a0the failure of that approach<\/a> earlier this year.<\/p>\n

Recently\u00a0Twitter booted accounts<\/a> from those connected to\u00a0the alt-right movement for “harassment and ‘hateful conduct<\/a>,’ which includes \u201cnon-consensual slurs, epithets, racist and sexist tropes\u201d and \u201cbehavior that incites fear about a protected group.\u201d \u00a0This led the editors at Slate to ask if Facebook or Twitter might possibly ban President Trump<\/a>. Twitter responded that it wouldn’t rule it out. As Slate said, “That\u2019s a tough line from a company that once declared itself the ‘free speech wing of the free speech party.’\u201d (BTW, the click-bait headline for this post might have been: “Twitter considers banning President Trump!”)<\/p>\n

So where are we now? Some of the ejected\u00a0Twitter users have moved to a new platform that promises\u00a0greater freedom of speech. Gab.ai is, according to the New York Times<\/em><\/a>, the far right’s “new digital safe space.” It’s much too early to tell if Gab has any legs, but if it does it will likely do little to advance dialog and understanding between those contending for the future of our country. Amanda Hess of the NYTimes<\/em> sums it up nicely, “It\u2019s the next logical step after all the blocking and muting on Twitter and filtering and unfollowing on Facebook split America into two social media realities. Where there once was a bubble, now there\u2019s a wall.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Overheard in a newsroom:\u00a0\u201cWhat is journalism even supposed to be now? We reported the facts, but they didn\u2019t matter.\u201d In case you didn’t hear, “post-truth” is Oxford Dictionary’s word of the year for 2016. Here’s how they define it on their website.\u00a0 The challenge for journalists, and really\u00a0anyone who get to the bottom of things, … <\/p>\n

Continue reading “Free Speech for All in a Fact-Free Era?”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,7,10,11,18,22,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1812","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-1st-amendment","category-ethics","category-interactive-media","category-journalism","category-politics","category-regulation","category-social-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebersolemedia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1812","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebersolemedia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebersolemedia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebersolemedia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebersolemedia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1812"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ebersolemedia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1812\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebersolemedia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebersolemedia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1812"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebersolemedia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}